Intel Core i9 is a new generation processor. Intel's most powerful processor Power consumption and speed

Hi all! Today I would like to talk about a new line of processors IntelCorei9. 2 years after writing the article, we decided to update the information about existing models of Core i9 processors, because the information should always remain relevant for our readers.

In addition, the line of processors has been updated and acquired a new generation of processors that have become even more productive (on average by 5-7%). The absolute leader in performance today is Intel Core i9-9980XE. Well, its price is appropriate.

Intel Core i9 - technical specifications

We present you the updated technical specifications of processors IntelCorei9 7th, 8th and 9th generation. By the way, the 8th generation only applies to laptop processors. And for desktop PCs only 7 and 9.

Technical characteristics of the entire line of processors IntelCorei9.

In addition to the characteristics presented in the table, there are also general characteristics for the entire line, so it is easier to describe them separately than to expand the table for them.

All processors in the lineIntelCorei9 (desktop):

• Runs on LGA-2066 socket
• Supports 4 channels DDR4 2666 GHz
• Supports 44 PCI-Express 3.0 lanes
• They have an open multiplier. This is very good for lovers
• Manufacturing process 14 nm (all generations)

Why do we need such powerful processors as i9?

Yes, IntelCorei9 very powerful and very expensive processors. What are they needed for? Well, an i7 is definitely enough for you to enjoy all modern games. And even an i5 can handle multitasking on your home computer. This is all of the past. But technology does not stand still. Take a look around. Virtual reality is trying to penetrate our lives from all sides, from virtual travel to interesting locations and virtual staging for educational purposes to 3D-VR games that require more and more computing resources. This is on the one hand.

On the other hand, artificial intelligence is an equally resource-hungry “creature.” Of course, this little animal is waiting for the first real quantum computers to appear in the world to show what it can do. But even now we need to do something to prepare him for a new round of evolution. Therefore, processors will become more and more powerful. AND IntelCorei9 And AMD Ryzen Threadripper confirmation of this.

Conclusion

And I can summarize this article by saying that I am glad that noticeable progress has finally begun in central processors. I've been waiting for him for a long time. And then, from year to year, minimal progress in this area made me depressed and made me think: “ What about our high-tech future? Will I reach it at this rate?" Now I believe it more and more.

As for your home computers, I doubt you'll have to upgrade to an i9 in the next few years. So don't be outraged by the prices of these processors. Those guys who need such performance will have the means to buy them, I'm sure.

Intel Core i9 is a new generation processor for solving modern resource-intensive tasks!

Did you read to the very end?

Was this article helpful?

Not really

What exactly did you not like? Was the article incomplete or false?
Write in comments and we promise to improve!

The era of the latest high-performance desktop processors is here - experience whole new ways to do everything you need with processors Intel® Core™ i9. With the new family, you can choose the right model to suit your performance needs. Processors are available with different numbers of cores (from 10 to 18) to provide extreme performance:

Intel® Core™ i9-7920X

• 12 Cores / 24 Threads
• Base frequency 2.9 GHz
• Turbo Boost 2.0: 4.3 GHz
• Turbo Boost Max 3.0: 4.4 GHz
• 16.5 MB Cache
• TDP 140 W

Intel® Core™ i9-7940X

• 14 Cores / 28 Threads
• Base frequency 3.1 GHz
• Turbo Boost 2.0: 4.3 GHz
• Turbo Boost Max 3.0: 4.4 GHz
• 19.25 MB Cache
• TDP 165 W

Intel® Core™ i9-7960X

• 16 Cores / 32 Threads
• Base frequency 2.8 GHz
• Turbo Boost 2.0: 4.2 GHz
• Turbo Boost Max 3.0: 4.4 GHz
• 22 MB Cache
• TDP 165 W

Intel® Core™ i9-7980XE

• 18 Cores / 36 Threads
• Base frequency 2.6 GHz
• Turbo Boost 2.0: 4.2 GHz
• Turbo Boost Max 3.0: 4.4 GHz
• 24.75 MB Cache
• TDP 165 W

NEWEST TECHNOLOGIES

The platform features out-of-the-box Intel® Optane™ memory and Intel® Optane™ SSDs for impressive system performance. Featuring true-to-life 4K graphics, quad-channel DDR4 2666 memory, Thunderbolt™ 3 technology with 40Gbps round-trip transfer speeds to connect virtually any device, and up to 8 SATA ports for RAID arrays, these processors are the ultimate solution. for desktop gaming PCs

All Intel® Core™ i9 processors:
- Runs on LGA-2066 socket
- Supports 4 channels DDR4 2666 GHz
- Supports 44 PCI-Express 3.0 lanes
- Have an open multiplier.
- Manufacturing process 14 nm

INTEL TURBO BOOST MAX 3.0

It is a combination of software and hardware that provides more than 15% improvement in single-threaded computing performance. This technology optimizes the performance of computing with a small number of threads by identifying the fastest processor cores and directing the most resource-intensive workloads to them.

Intel® Turbo Boost Max 3.0 does not replace technology Intel® Turbo Boost 2.0. It complements this by significantly increasing the clock speed of the fastest cores to provide greater flexibility and more efficient use of processor resources.

INTEL® OPTANE™

Memory Intel® Optane™ is an intelligent and adaptive system accelerator that adapts to your tasks, speeding up and simplifying your computer work. Intelligent memory software automatically remembers your computer usage patterns to speed up frequent tasks, optimizing your computer experience based on your individual needs.

WHO ARE THESE PROCESSORS FOR?

Modern games are not limited to one gameplay. Play and stream your playthrough at maximum settings on PC. Experience extreme processor performance Intel® Core™ i9, thanks to which the gameplay becomes so realistic that the boundary between the game and reality is blurred.

Family Intel® Core™ i9 processors Delivers extreme performance when running multiple workloads simultaneously in real time. You can free up more time for creativity while your system is running Intel® Core™ i9 simultaneously handles huge 4K file loading, effects rendering, and other resource-intensive workloads in the background.

Intel is a prestigious company with extensive experience in the production of electronic devices and computer components, which has its own clear development strategy. The development of the 18-core Intel Core i9-7980XE chip is not just an improvement in technology, but an important strategic step. We can safely assume that the i9 is not aimed at home use, although most Intel processors are designed for desktop and gaming computers. But why would Intel release such a “monster”?

There can only be one answer: this is due to the announcement of new Threadripper processors with an impressive 16 cores from AMD.

Recently, competition in processor development has become more intense as AMD began releasing a more affordable, high-performance family of Ryzen chips, each of which has quite a few advantages. One of the best is the Ryzen 7 1800X, an eight-core processor with sixteen threads and 4MB L2/16MB L3 cache. It reaches almost half the price of an Intel processor of similar specifications.

To remain competitive, Intel must work to improve its innovative chip architecture and do everything it can to attract professionals who want a good return on their investment. The fact that there is demand for a 16-core chip from AMD gives Intel hope to capture its market share with the early release of a slightly more monstrous processor.

Why might you need 18 processor cores?

Honestly, for the coolest apps and games, octa-core processors provide more than enough performance and do a great job. Each additional core on the processor means less lag in demanding applications. Eight cores can run eight active processes with very little interruption to the flow of the operating system as a whole.

However, for professional 3D modelers and architects the story is a little different. Some people need as many cores as possible to run programs that perform a lot of calculations in parallel. By jumping from eight to sixteen or eighteen cores, they will see huge performance gains. This makes them more productive at work.

Most of the programs we run in everyday life do not reach this level of complexity. Therefore, for the average user, buying a processor for several thousand dollars is a waste of money. For example, applications such as Skype will not use all the cores that the processor has. It will work in one thread, without parallelization. The same goes for many other programs. They will not work in multi-core mode. At the moment, home PC users don't need more than 8 cores, and it's quite difficult to say when you'll need 16 or 18 cores. To the question “why does a computer need many cores” from an ordinary user, the most logical answer is “No reason”

Share in the comments, do you use applications that require a large number of cores?

In the case of Intel processors, we have two completely different microarchitectures. And two representatives of Skylake-X differ in the number of cores and their frequencies, but have the same memory controller and the same mesh network (with the same synchronization frequency of 2.4 GHz). They are marking time at approximately the same level, and this level is not very distinguishable from the Core i7-8700K.

If you look at the detailed results of the programs included in the group, it is easy to see that the 7980XE noticeably outperforms the 7900X where you need to calculate something “in the background,” but cannot boast of anything in interactive applications. In SolidWorks, it loses even to the Core i7-7800X, i.e., to the younger Skylake-X for LGA2066 (however, both Ryzen Threadrippers in this application lose to their “halves,” which, however, is not much of a consolation). It ended up being the fastest we tested, but it's more accurate to consider it equal to the 1950X. Twice cheaper. And to a greater extent, outperforming his partner in price sparring.

The end result looks quite funny - in fact, with “autumn products” Intel made up for AMD’s breakthrough in the field of increasing processor performance. Anyway, accurate to the milliliter top processors for LGA1151 and LGA2066 are slightly faster than for AM4 and TR4, respectively. True, from a practical point of view, this makes some sense only in relation to the first platform, since in its case everything is fine with prices, and there are other advantages. With Skylake-X, parity in performance is observed only at different prices of solutions and vice versa :) But this is explained simply - in fact, there are not so many tasks in our test methodology for both Ryzen Threadripper and Core i9. Even though, at the request of workers We greatly enriched it with multi-threaded software, cutting out (literally live) a variety of interactivity.

Energy consumption and energy efficiency

However, it is worth noting that in such conditions the Core i9-7980XE turns out to be more economical than the i9-7900X. This is not some kind of limitation of the board's power supply and/or cooling system - in this case the result would be the same. So, it’s just that the frequencies in different loading modes are chosen correctly enough so that the new extreme can not only work faster (which, as we have seen, it does not always succeed in), but also consume less energy.

As a result, due to a combination of factors, the platform in its older versions has become more “energy efficient”. Which is logical - when multi-threaded loading, a larger number of low-frequency cores can work more efficiently than a smaller number with a higher clock frequency. A possible answer to why all manufacturers have already reached for multi-cores in smartphone SoCs. True, with all the attractiveness of this approach, it is worth understanding that a larger number of cores also means a larger chip area, and therefore its cost. And unpleasant side effects in cases where this very “multithreaded loading” is not detected. The latter can be compensated for by flexible control of the clock frequency, but there is nothing to compensate for the former.

Total

In principle, from the point of view of abstract technical progress, the birth of the older subline of processors for LGA2066 can only be assessed positively. Not because previously such a number of cores was generally unavailable - it has been found in server processors, as mentioned above, since the days of LGA2011-3. It’s just that just a couple of years ago, for an 18-core Xeon of a lower frequency, they “asked” about seven thousand dollars, but now you can get within two thousand (at least, if you look at the recommended prices). And 14 cores in the new family will generally cost less than 10 just a year ago. Let everyone decide for themselves who to thank for this. But, in general, AMD is also “playing” in this field now (which also wasn’t the case a year, two, or five years ago), and it’s playing well - at least taking into account the final prices of the products.

The main problem is that such solutions are needed by too few users - it is not so easy to load them with work. On a home personal computer, this is practically impossible (at best, only sometimes and for a very short time). But their development and even simple production are expensive, regardless of whether a special crystal is made or an assembly from pre-selected “successful” ones. Actually, this is why the prices of such solutions differ markedly from those usual for the mass market - it is still not possible to bring them to the mass market. And are they needed there? The times when each step in increasing the performance of the central processor of a personal computer significantly increased the capabilities of the latter are in the past. But nevertheless, such “steps,” as we see, are being made (and no matter for what reasons), which those who still need such processors can use to their advantage.

The secret has become clear: Intel responded to the emergence of new AMD Ryzen processors and not only introduced multi-core “monsters” that received up to 18 cores inclusive, but also reduced the “price per core” in the top segment.

Before the release of Ryzen, this processor manufacturer planned, according to data from leaked roadmaps, to bring to the market in the summer a new multi-core flagship Skylake X with “only” 10 cores. After the Ryzen presentation, we started talking about 12 cores. When it became known about AMD Threadripper, everything became even more serious: now Intel representatives at the Computex exhibition said that the new Core i9 could have up to 18 cores. This is 80% more cores than currently found in high-end desktop processors.

Counterattack against AMD Threadripper

Intel's top model will be the Core i9 7980XE processor with 18 cores and 36 threads. Clock speeds and the exact release date have not been announced at this time. We believe that he will not appear until August. This is because the Core i9-7920X with 12 cores and 24 threads is also scheduled for release in August. Options with up to 10 cores inclusive should begin to appear in June. The reason for delaying the release date may be that Intel only recently included versions with 12 to 18 cores in its roadmap. The TDP level for Skylake X models should be from 140 to 165 W.

Core i9 clocked at up to 4.5 GHz

Accurate information is available about, which will receive 10 cores and a base clock frequency of 3.3 GHz, rising to 4.5 GHz in Turbo mode. It should appear in June. Starting with the eight-core class, which will be introduced by the Core i9-7820X, Intel is reducing the number of PCIe lanes from 44 to 28, which may limit the throughput of expansion cards.

Thus, anyone who wants an ultra-fast system with multiple graphics cards and M2 SSDs will need to go for more expensive models. Intel currently offers 40 PCIe lanes in models with six cores.

Intel Core i7 and i9 with 6-18 cores

Skylake X: Improvements in Performance and Pricing

The new processors are not the latest generation in terms of architecture, but, nevertheless, compared to their predecessors, they received some architectural improvements, which are likely borrowed from solutions for Xeon servers. In particular, each core now has access to 1 MB of lightning-fast L2 cache (4 times more than current Kaby Lake processors). In addition, support for AVX512 is being discussed, which should provide a decent performance boost in applications that support it. It also promises support for DDR4 RAM at a clock frequency of 2666 MHz.

Information about prices has also appeared. As usual, Intel strives to make a significant markup, but in the “lower” segment there is strong price pressure from AMD, because this competitor always asks a little less per core. The top Intel model with 18 cores costs about 114 thousand rubles. 10 cores can be obtained for only about 57 thousand rubles. (instead of the previous 95 thousand rubles). The eight-core will cost approximately 34 thousand rubles, that is, approximately 28 thousand rubles. cheaper than before. AMD is currently selling the Ryzen 7 1700 with eight cores for about RUB 18,000.

Let us remind you that in the near future AMD plans to present its top-class processors for desktop computers, which in the top version will have 16 cores. Most likely, these models will significantly reshuffle our rating of extreme processors. Yes, PC fans are in for a hot summer.

Chip's Take: It's finally happening again!

What a development! Until recently, the central processor market seemed to be in a state of stagnation: AMD was essentially relegated to the background, and Intel every year introduced new quad-core processors to the market with performance increased by 5-10% - monotonous, boring. Anyone who wanted to get more cores had to, as they say, stick their hand much deeper into their wallet.

And now AMD, with its eight-core CPUs, has not only thoroughly shaken up the market, but is also threatening to take away the crown of the desktop processor market leader from Intel, releasing the already announced 16-core car called “Threadripper” in June. This again set Intel and, accordingly, the entire market in motion - a real holiday for enthusiasts has arrived. However, ordinary consumers, for whom price plays an important role, will also benefit from the upcoming multi-core competition among manufacturers in the coming months and years.

Competition revitalizes business - today this expression is more relevant than ever. Now it’s up to the buyers, who will choose the vector of further developments. After all, in the end, each of them will have to decide for themselves whether to continue investing in an already familiar brand (Intel), or support the catching leader of the developer (AMD), which offers surprisingly much performance to those who purchase its processors.

At least for now, the best value for money, as shown in our ranking of desktop processors, is found in products with the AMD logo. On the other hand, in the summer, Intel may raise the “performance measurement” bar one step higher.